This post was first published on April 6, 2013
It’s not easy to find a connection between Rome and Amanda Knox, the
The decision in the last week of March to overturn Knox’s and her then
boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito’s acquittal was issued by Italy’s Supreme Court,
called the Corte Suprema di Cassazione. That Court
of Cassation is located in Rome’s Palace of Justice, a turn of the last century
building most Romans think is comically bad. Of course, Bill finds things to
love about it, and will do a post on it some day.
The Palace of Justice from the Piazza Cavour side (that's Cavour on the column) |
From the Lungotevere side - it looks its best in this photo |
There will be more pronouncements
in the Knox/Sollecito case coming from Rome, too, when the Court issues its explanation –
which it has not yet – within about 90 days.
That explanation should be fascinating, because the lower court, an
intermediate appeals court, threw out Knox’s and Sollecito’s convictions on the
grounds there was NO evidence.
I must admit we were not initially
fascinated with the Knox case, perhaps because it all seemed too full of
extreme claims and positions. And we
also assumed Knox would get a reasonable trial under the Italian system, whose differences from the U.S.'s we appreciate and had no intention of derogating. It wasn’t until I read the Afterword in Douglas Preston’s book on
murders in and around Florence, The Monster of Florence, that I became
intrigued by the Knox and Sollecito cases.
I didn’t even want to read The Monster of Florence, but someone
gave it to me for Christmas and I felt obliged to at least look at it.
Preston |
I still wasn’t that interested in
murders around Florence, but Preston's and co-author Mario Spezi’s treatment by the prosecutor in the Florence cases was astounding. The prosecutor, Giuliano Mignini, had Spezi
jailed. Preston can’t go back to
Italy. And they were simply journalists
investigating the murders. It reminds
one of Egypt or Syria or Russia, not Italy.
And, when the Afterword tells us
that this abusive prosecutor who accused Spezi of the murders at one point is
the same one who cooked up the stories about Knox and Sollecito, that was riveting Mignini has since been
charged with multiple counts of abuse of office. Most of
the charges were thrown out, but one remains and is on appeal. He remains in office nonetheless and has risen in profile to an English Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuliano_Mignini).
And, I should point out,
Mignini also sued the West Seattle Herald. Having been born and raised in West Seattle,
I can attest that this little neighborhood newspaper (births, deaths, prom
queens, grocery coupons) is not exactly into cutting-edge journalism. Stooping to sue the Herald would make
me laugh, if the entire affair weren’t so tragic.
It’s interesting to us, too,
that Italians and Americans seem to have two very different takes on the Knox
case. Most Americans think she is
innocent. Most Italians think she is
guilty and that only Hillary Clinton (!) got her out of jail and back to the
U.S. The Italians are disgusted at the
Americans’ portrayal of their judicial system – but they should take a hard
look at Mignini, in my opinion. One dual citizen friend of ours, Don Carroll, who is about the most measured person I’ve known, wrote a piece I recommend in 2011 about the Knox case in the online
magazine, The American/inItalia: http://www.theamericanmag.com/article.php?feature=law&column=101&article=2997.
Dempsey |
Dianne
No comments:
Post a Comment